The use of proofs in diversity arguments

Littlewood, B. (2000). The use of proofs in diversity arguments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(10), pp. 1022-1023. doi: 10.1109/32.879822

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (13kB) | Preview

Abstract

The limits to the reliability that can be claimed for a design-diverse fault-tolerant system are mainly determined by the dependence that must be expected in the failure behaviours of the different versions: claims for independence between version failure processes are not believable. In this note we examine a different approach, in which a simple secondary system is used as a back-up to a more complex primary. The secondary system is sufficiently simple that claims for its perfection (with respect to design faults) are possible, but there is not complete certainty about such perfection. It is shown that assessment of the reliability of the overall fault-tolerant system in this case may take advantage of claims for independence that are more plausible than those involved in design diversity.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2000 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works
Uncontrolled Keywords: software fault tolerance, reliability, safety, probability, verification, proof
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Computer software
Divisions: School of Informatics > Centre for Software Reliability
URI: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/1616

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics