Publish (and Be Popular) or Perish: Value Metrics for Scholarly Work in a Digital Environment

Singer, J. (2008). Publish (and Be Popular) or Perish: Value Metrics for Scholarly Work in a Digital Environment. Journalism Studies, 9(4), pp. 599-604. doi: 10.1080/14616700802114407

PDF - Accepted Version
Download (156kB) | Preview


The following essays were presented at an Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication conference panel entitled: “New Media, New Scholarship: the Internet's Potential in the World of Ideas.” Panelist Mitch Stephens challenges the academic world's worshipfulness of the printed word by arguing for new understandings through the use of new technologies. Stephens posits that we should move away from our devotion to print to achieve new spatial and temporal meanings derived from the Internet. Panelist Jane Singer debates the authority of peer-reviewed print journals over what academic communities value. With the Internet, there can be new metrics for how to value content based on user-generated authority. In addition to a jury of peers, she argues for the importance of a jury of readers. She suggests that in the academy “getting published counts, but getting read should count too.”

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journalism Studies on 27 June 2008, available online:
Subjects: P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General)
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > Z665 Library Science. Information Science
Divisions: School of Arts > Department of Journalism

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics