Measuring well-being in aphasia: The GHQ-28 versus the NHP

Hilari, K., Byng, S. & Pring, T. (2001). Measuring well-being in aphasia: The GHQ-28 versus the NHP. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 3(2), pp. 129-137. doi: 10.3109/14417040109003719

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (57kB) | Preview

Abstract

This study aimed to get the opinions of people with aphasia on two subjective well-being measures: the General Health Questionnaire 28-item version (GHQ-28) (Goldberg & Hillier, 1979) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) (Hunt, McKenna, McEwen, Williams, & Papp, 1981). Twelve persons with moderate to mild aphasia of at least 2-years duration completed the GHQ-28 and the NHP. In a semistructured intenriew, they gave their feedback on the two questionnaires. All participants were able to complete both instruments. Nine out of 12 participants showed high psychological distress (> 5/28) in the GHQ-28. The NHP (part 1 less the physical abilities section) had a correlation of 0.78 (p < .01) with the GHQ-28. The social dysfunction subscale of the NHP identified more problems in the participants with aphasia than the social isolation subscale of the GHQ-28. The majority of the participants (10 out of 12) preferred the NHP, as they found it easier to understand and respond to. This small-scale study indicated that both the GHQ-28 and the NHP can be administered to people with moderate to mild aphasia and provide useful information on their well-being. Participants reported that the NHP was easier to do, and it asked questions more relevant to their situation.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright Informa 2001
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: School of Health Sciences > Department of Language & Communication Science
URI: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/5026

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics