City Research Online

A critical appraisal of the impact of section 3 of the Mental Capacity Act (2005)

Amblum-Almér, R. (2014). A critical appraisal of the impact of section 3 of the Mental Capacity Act (2005). Journal of Paramedic Practice: the clinical monthly for emergency care professionals, 6(8), pp. 422-428. doi: 10.12968/jpar.2014.6.8.422

Abstract

Paramedic’s have verbalised uncertainty on how to proceed when treating unwell patients who refuse treatment, stating that they feel ill equipped to interpret situations when patients refuse treatment. They expressed a need, to be formally trained in how to systematically, yet quickly, assess a patient’s capacity, rather than relying on intuition or opting out with the ‘take them to hospital’ approach, as they report it is better to face the accusation of assault or battery, than allegations of negligence. This article will explore the appropriate mechanisms and approach for the assessment of capacity in emergency situations. Capacity will be defined according to MCA (2005) with an explanation of consent and the particular difficulties faced by paramedics in the assessment of capacity in an emergency will be identified and analysed. Finally, there will be an attempt to explain the ‘correct’ way to assess capacity, with reference to the MCA, the accompanying Code of Practice.

Publication Type: Article
Publisher Keywords: Autonomy; Consent; Decision making; Mental capacity; Mental Capcity; Act 2005; Negligence
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
Departments: School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Nursing
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of critical appraisal of section 3.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (303kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login