City Research Online

Evaluating a new objective grading software for conjunctival hyperaemia

Huntjens, B., Basi, M. and Nagra, M. (2019). Evaluating a new objective grading software for conjunctival hyperaemia. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.07.003

Abstract

Background/ Aims: Standardised numeric grading scales are used in ophthalmic practice to improve consistency between clinicians in recording the severity of ocular conditions and to facilitate the monitoring of such changes. We investigated the intra- and inter-observer grading reliability and the agreement between subjective Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU) and Efron grading scales as well as a new Advanced Ophthalmic Systems (AOS) software which uses an objective approach to grading conjunctival hyperaemia.

Methods: One experienced observer graded n = 30 bulbar and n = 26 palpebral conjunctival hyperaemia images to 0.1 increments. Masked grading of randomised images was undertaken for all three methods, on two separate occasions. The agreement within and between the grading methods was assessed between sessions, and compared to the results of a novice observer.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between test and retest values. However, repeatability in the grading estimates of both bulbar and palpebral conjunctival hyperaemia was improved using the AOS grading method (R2 = 0.998; Coefficient of Repeatability CoR 0.10–0.13), compared to Efron (R2 = 0.926; CoR 0.62) and CCLRU (R2 = 0.885–0.911; CoR 0.50–0.78). Intraclass coefficient correlations (ICC) improved inter-observer agreement using objective (> 0.995) versus subjective methods (0.853–0.959).

Conclusion: These subjective and objective grading methods are not interchangeable. Due to the excellent repeatability and improved agreement between experienced and novice observers, the objective grading method provides a more consistent approach when grading ocular abnormalities and may achieve greater reliability in record keeping and clinical monitoring in the future.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: © Elsevier 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Keywords: Objective grading, Subjective grading, Agreement, Bulbar, Palpebral, Conjunctiva, Hyperaemia. Imaging
Subjects: R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology
Departments: School of Health Sciences > Optometry & Visual Science
URI: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/22543
[img] Text - Accepted Version
This document is not freely accessible until 18 July 2020 due to copyright restrictions.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

To request a copy, please use the button below.

Request a copy

Export

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login