City Research Online

The Perils of Accountability After Crisis: Ambiguity, Policy Legacies, and Value Trade-offs

Hilliard, N., Kovras, I. ORCID: 0000-0003-2787-2389 and Loizides, N. (2019). The Perils of Accountability After Crisis: Ambiguity, Policy Legacies, and Value Trade-offs. Cambridge Review of International Affairs,

Abstract

This article interrogates a tension at the heart of the principle of accountability: accountability as a principle of non-impunity of public officials versus accountability as a form of bureaucratic organisation and control. Although these dimensions are distinguishable in the abstract, their ambiguity has led to an expectations gap among both citizens and elites. The historical legacies of previous policies can exacerbate this expectations gap, leading to a variety of value trade-offs, with the potential to undermine other political values, such as political learning, consensusbuilding, and citizens' rights. We present examples of the trade-offs resulting from this expectations gap, focusing on moments of crisis in which such trade-offs can be seen most acutely, and highlight its role as a vehicle of global populism.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: This article has been accepted for publication in Cambridge Review of International Affairs, published by Taylor & Francis.
Subjects: J Political Science > JZ International relations
Departments: School of Arts & Social Sciences > International Politics
URI: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/23005
[img] Text - Accepted Version
This document is not freely accessible due to copyright restrictions.

To request a copy, please use the button below.

Request a copy

Export

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login