City Research Online

Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods

Morgan, M. J., Melmoth, D. & Solomon, J. A. (2013). Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods. Visual Neuroscience, 30(5-6), pp. 197-206. doi: 10.1017/s095252381300045x

Abstract

Class A psychophysical observations are based on the linking hypothesis that perceptually distinguishable stimuli must correspond to different brain events. Class B observations are related to the appearance of stimuli not their discriminability. There is no clear linking hypothesis underlying Class B observations, but they are necessary for studying the effects of context on appearance, including a large class of phenomena known as “illusions.” Class B observations are necessarily measures of observer bias (Fechner’s “constant error”) as opposed to Class A measures of sensitivity (Fechner’s “variable error”). It is therefore important that Class B observations distinguish between response biases, decisional biases, and perceptual biases. This review argues that the commonly used method of single stimuli fails to do this, and that multiple-alternative forced choice (mAFC) methods can do a better job, particularly if combined with a roving pedestal.

Publication Type: Article
Publisher Keywords: Psychophysics; Linking hypotheses; 2AFC; Method of single stimuli
Subjects: R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology
Departments: School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Optometry & Visual Sciences
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods..pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0.

Download (722kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login