Abstract

We empirically evaluate how accounting and financial variables affect the level of systemic risk in traditional and shadow banks, and in real estate finance services in China over the period 2006-2019. We also conduct some stability analysis by evaluating the impact of crisis sub-periods. We find that systemic risk increases in the Size of large financial institutions, particularly shadow entities, while it is insensitive to the Size of real estate finance services. Real estate finance services are instead particularly sensitive to Maturity Mismatch and Leverage. Finally, systemic risk differs across state and non state owned banks.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2022. This article has been accepted for publication in Journal of Financial Stability by Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Keywords:	Systemic Risk, Traditional Banks, Shadow Banking Entities, Real Estate, Financial Crises, Financial Stability, Panel Data
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Departments:	Bayes Business School > Finance

Text - Accepted Version This document is not freely accessible due to copyright restrictions. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. To request a copy, please use the button below. Request a copy

Export

Downloads