The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study
van den Berg, L. M. M., Balaam, M-C., Nowland, R. , Moncrieff, G., Topalidou, A., Thompson, S., Thomson, G., Jonge, A., Downe, S., Ellison, G., Fenton, A., Heazell, A., Kingdon, C., Matthews, Z., Severns, A., Wright, A., Akooji, N., Cull, J., Berg, L., Crossland, N., Feeley, C., Franso, B., Heys, S., Sarian, A., Booker, M., Sandall, J., Thornton, J., Lynskey-Wilkie, T., Wilson, V., Abe, R., Awe, T., Adeyinka, T., Bender-Atik, R., Brigante, L., Brione, R., Cadee, F., Duff, E., Draycott, T., Fisher, D., Francis, A., Franx, A., Erasmus, M. C., Frith, L., Griew, L., Harmer, C., Homer, C., Knight, M., Mansfield, A., Marlow, N., Mcaree, T., Monteith, D., Reed, K., Richens, Y., Rocca-Ihenacho, L. 
ORCID: 0000-0002-8161-3938, Ross-Davie, M., Talbot, S., Taylor, M. & Treadwell, M. (2023).
The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study.
Women and Birth, 36(1),
pp. 127-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.010
Abstract
Background
The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises.
Aim
To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations.
Method
A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders.
Findings
Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised.
Conclusion
We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women’s and families’ values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events.
| Publication Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
| Publisher Keywords: | COVID-19, Maternal Health Services, Newborn Care, Infection Control, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Policy Drivers |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform Q Science > QR Microbiology R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics |
| Departments: | School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Midwifery & Radiography |
| SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.
Download (466kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Metadata
MetadataActions (login required)
Admin Login