City Research Online

Validating Trend-Based End Points for Neuroprotection Trials in Glaucoma

Montesano, G. ORCID: 0000-0002-9148-2804, Garway-Heath, D. F., Rabiolo, A. , De Moraes, C. G., Ometto, G. ORCID: 0000-0002-0900-4847 & Crabb, D. P. ORCID: 0000-0001-8611-1155 (2023). Validating Trend-Based End Points for Neuroprotection Trials in Glaucoma. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 12(10), article number 20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.10.20

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the power of trend-based visual field (VF) progression end points against long-term development of event-based end points accepted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS: One eye from 3352 patients with ≥10 24-2 VFs (median = 11 years) follow-up were analyzed. Two FDA-compatible criteria were applied to these series to label "true-progressed" eyes: ≥5 locations changing from baseline by more than 7 dB (FDA-7) or by more than the expected test-retest variability (GPA-like) in 2 consecutive tests. Observed rates of progression (RoP) were used to simulate trial-like series (2 years) randomly assigned (1000 times) to a "placebo" or a "treatment" arm. We simulated neuroprotective "treatment" effects by changing the proportion of "true progressed" eyes in the two arms. Two trend-based methods for mean deviation (MD) were assessed: (1) linear mixed model (LMM), testing average difference in RoP between the two arms, and (2) time-to-progression (TTP), calculated by linear regression as time needed for MD to decline by predefined cutoffs from baseline. Power curves with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for trend and event-based methods on the simulated series. RESULTS: The FDA-7 and GPA-like progression was achieved by 45% and 55% of the eyes in the clinical database. LMM and TTP had similar power, significantly superior to the event-based methods, none of which reached 80% power. All methods had a 5% false-positive rate. CONCLUSIONS: The trend-based methods can efficiently detect treatment effects defined by long-term FDA-compatible progression. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The assessment of the power of trend-based methods to detect clinically relevant progression end points.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publisher Keywords: visual field (VF); glaucoma; neuroprotection; clinical trials
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology
Departments: School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Optometry & Visual Sciences
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of i2164-2591-12-10-20_1698670642.2296.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.

Download (847kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login