City Research Online

Self-monitoring blood pressure in Pregnancy: Evaluation of health professional experiences of the BUMP trials

Chisholm, A., Tucker, K. L., Crawford, C. , Green, M., Greenfield, S., Hodgkinson, J., Lavallee, L., Leeson, P., Mackillop, L., McCourt, C. ORCID: 0000-0003-4765-5795, Sandall, J., Wilson, H., Chappell, L. C., McManus, R. J. & Hinton, L. (2024). Self-monitoring blood pressure in Pregnancy: Evaluation of health professional experiences of the BUMP trials. Pregnancy Hypertension, 35, pp. 88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.01.134


The BUMP trials evaluated a self-monitoring of blood pressure intervention in addition to usual care, testing whether they improved detection or control of hypertension for women at risk of hypertension or with hypertension during pregnancy. This process evaluation aimed to understand healthcare professionals’ perspectives and experiences of the BUMP trials of self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy.

Twenty-two in-depth qualitative interviews and an online survey with 328 healthcare professionals providing care for pregnant people in the BUMP trials were carried out across five maternity units in England.

Analysis used Normalisation Process Theory to identify factors required for successful implementation and integration into routine practice. Healthcare professionals felt self-monitoring of blood pressure did not over-medicalise pregnancy for women with, or at risk of, hypertension. Most said self-monitored readings positively affected their clinical encounters and professional roles, provided additive information on which to base decisions and enriched their relationships with pregnant people. Self-monitoring of blood pressure shifts responsibilities. Some healthcare professionals felt women having responsibility to decide on timing of monitoring and whether to act on self-monitored readings was unduly burdensome, and resulted in healthcare professionals taking additional responsibility for supporting them.

Despite healthcare professionals’ early concerns that self-monitoring of blood pressure might over-medicalise pregnancy, our analysis shows the opposite was the case when used in the care of pregnant people with, or at higher risk of, hypertension. While professionals retained ultimate clinical responsibility, they viewed self-monitoring of blood pressure as a means of sharing responsibility and empowering women to understand their bodies, to make judgements and decisions, and to contribute to their care.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (
Publisher Keywords: BUMP trials, Blood pressure, Evaluation, Health professional, Pregnancy hypertension, Self-monitoring
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Departments: School of Health & Psychological Sciences
School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Midwifery & Radiography
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of BUMP professional perspectives paper.pdf]
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.

Download (490kB) | Preview


Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login