Refining visual field trend progression criteria in glaucoma: impact of significance thresholds and test frequency
Tan, J. C. K.
ORCID: 0000-0003-4117-7446, Montesano, G.
ORCID: 0000-0002-9148-2804, Bell, K.
ORCID: 0000-0003-4127-1635 , Crowston, J. & Crabb, D. P.
ORCID: 0000-0001-8754-3902 (2026).
Refining visual field trend progression criteria in glaucoma: impact of significance thresholds and test frequency.
Ophthalmology Glaucoma,
doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2026.01.004
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the stability of visual field (VF) progression events and to evaluate strategies to reduce false-positive (FP) progression.
Design: Retrospective study.
Subjects: Two thousand one hundred thirty-three eyes of 2133 patients with 12 consecutive VF tests from five National Health Service glaucoma clinics.
Methods: A progression event was defined as a negative slope and P value < 0.05. False-positive progression events (“reversions”) were defined as events where the P value fell below 0.05 at ≥ 1 visit and subsequently rose above 0.05 at a later time point. The impact of stricter probability thresholds (P < 0.02, 0.01 and 0.005) and event assessment at later visits on FP progression was evaluated.
Main Outcome Measures: Frequency of FP progression events.
Results: Four hundred fifty-seven (21.4%) eyes had at least one reversion at the P < 0.05 threshold, for a median interval of 2 visits. The mean rate of change at the time of apparent progression was –1.05 dB/year (95% confidence interval –1.19 to –0.92 dB/year). The proportions of eyes with FP progression events were significantly lower at stricter probability thresholds (13.7%, 9.9%, and 7.7% at P < 0.02, < 0.01, and < 0.005, respectively; P < 0.001). Using stricter thresholds conferred significantly lower hazards of FP progression (hazard ratio 0.60 for P < 0.02, 0.42 for P < 0.01, and 0.38 for P < 0.005; all P < 0.001).
Conclusions: A substantial proportion of apparent progression at the established P < 0.05 threshold may be falsely positive. Using stricter probability thresholds and initiating event detection at later visits may improve progression specificity in clinical practice.
Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
| Publication Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | © 2026 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| Publisher Keywords: | Glaucoma, Regression, Residuals, Variability, Visual field |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology |
| Departments: | School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Optometry & Visual Science |
| SWORD Depositor: |
This document is not freely accessible until 14 January 2027 due to copyright restrictions.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
To request a copy, please use the button below.
Request a copyExport
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Metadata
Metadata