Mental health practitioners’ experiences and practices in making decisions about onward care for patients presenting to emergency departments with self-harm or suicidal ideation: systematic review and meta-synthesis
Suzuki, M.
ORCID: 0000-0001-5242-0195, Bakou, A. E., Dove, J. & McCabe, R.
ORCID: 0000-0003-2041-7383 (2026).
Mental health practitioners’ experiences and practices in making decisions about onward care for patients presenting to emergency departments with self-harm or suicidal ideation: systematic review and meta-synthesis.
BJPsych Open, 12(3),
article number e95.
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2026.11007
Abstract
Background
Emergency department mental health practitioners (MHPs) decide onward care for individuals presenting with self-harm or suicidal ideation. However, their experiences and practices in making these decisions remain underexplored.
Aims
To synthesise research on MHPs’ experiences and practices in making decisions about onward care for patients presenting to emergency departments with self-harm or suicidal ideation.
Method
We searched six databases (inception to July 2024) for empirical studies of MHPs making care decisions for self-harm or suicidal patients in emergency departments. We used a segregated mixed-methods design, applying narrative synthesis of quantitative data and thematic synthesis of qualitative data.
Results
Eleven studies were included (one quantitative, one mixed-methods, nine qualitative). Narrative synthesis of quantitative data produced two themes: (a) subjective decision-making and variability among MHPs and (b) impact of the institutional mandate to discharge within 4 h on referral outcomes. Thematic synthesis of qualitative data generated five themes: (a) risk-centric culture is anti-therapeutic and shapes defensive practice, scepticism toward patients and burnout; (b) time and environmental pressures impact therapeutic potential of assessments; (c) ‘battling’ to access services: gatekeeping, cycles of repeat attendances affecting patient safety and staff moral injury; (d) strategies to facilitate access and extending care to overcome challenges in the emergency department and (e) potential for training to counter negative attitudes and stereotypes.
Conclusions
Intersecting institutional, systemic and emotional pressures shape MHPs’ practices, undermining assessment quality and access to care. System-level reforms and training should promote relational, compassionate care. Limited quantitative evidence restricted integration, and the review reflects high-income Western settings.
| Publication Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
| Publisher Keywords: | Self-harm, emergency department, liaison psychiatry, psychosocial assessment, suicide |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
| Departments: | School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Nursing & Midwifery School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Population Health & Policy |
| SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (622kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Metadata
Metadata