City Research Online

Abstract

The political resource curse posits that newly resource-rich states risk experiencing authoritarianism and conflict. This article examines Guyana as a most-likely case of that phenomenon. Drawing on interviews and quantitative indicators, we find that oil has not driven recent democratic backsliding and rising geopolitical tensions. Instead, Guyana's democratic fragility stems from winner-take-all electoral institutions in a context of deep ethnic polarisation and major parties’ limited normative commitment to democracy. Regarding conflict, Venezuela’s domestic politics, not oil, is the key driver of regional tensions. We therefore argue that the political resource curse framework may at times obscure more than it reveals, misattributing longstanding political tensions to resource wealth. Domestic and international political dynamics may be better understood as ‘politics with resources’ than politics cursed by oil. Promoting electoral reform, fostering stronger commitment to democratic norms within political parties, and ensuring credible deterrence may therefore matter more than technocratic resource governance.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	This article will be published in a revised form in Government and Opposition at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=GOV. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use.
Publisher Keywords:	democracy, oil, resource curse, democratic backsliding, conflict, institutions
Subjects:	J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JZ International relations
Departments:	School of Policy & Global Affairs School of Policy & Global Affairs > Department of International Politics
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Administrator

Export

Downloads