A Case Concerning Children's False Memories of Abuse: Recommendations Regarding Expert Witness Work
Otgaar, H., de Ruiter, C., Howe, M. L. , Hoetmer, L. & van Reekum, P. (2016). A Case Concerning Children's False Memories of Abuse: Recommendations Regarding Expert Witness Work. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(3), pp. 365-378. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1230924
Abstract
Expert witnesses can play a major role in legal cases concerning the reliability of statements. Abuse cases frequently contain only the memories of eyewitnesses/victims without the presence of physical evidence. Here, it is of the utmost importance that expert witnesses use scientific evidence for their expert opinion. In this case report, a case is described in which 20 children reported being sexually abused by the same teachers at their elementary school. The investigative steps that were taken by the police and school authorities are reviewed, including how they probably affected memory. In order to provide a sound expert opinion regarding the reliability of these statements, three recommendations are proposed. To reduce the effect of confirmation bias and increase objectivity, it is argued that expert witnesses’ reports should contain alternative scenarios, be checked by another expert, and focus on the origin and context of the first statement.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychiatry, Psychology and Law on 3 Oct 2016, available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1230924 |
Publisher Keywords: | eyewitness memory, false memory, legal case, reliability |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Departments: | School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Psychology |
SWORD Depositor: |
Download (421kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year