Do voters get it right? A test of the ascription-actuality trait theory of leadership with political elites.
Wyatt, M. & Silvester, J. ORCID: 0000-0002-2769-4722 (2018). Do voters get it right? A test of the ascription-actuality trait theory of leadership with political elites.. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), pp. 609-621. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.02.001
Abstract
Are the traits preferred by voters also associated with success in political office? Drawing on the ascription-actuality trait theory of leadership the present study examines whether traits ascribed to politicians predict leadership outcomes differently to the actual traits they possess. We collected self-ratings of politicians' personality (N = 138) using the NEO-PI-R (actual traits) and observer ratings of politicians' facial appearance (ascribed traits) to examine their relationship with (a) leadership emergence, measured using share of vote in election, and (b) in-role leadership effectiveness, rated anonymously by political and local authority colleagues. Facial appearance predicted leadership emergence but not effectiveness. Personality had a more nuanced relationship with leadership outcomes. Conscientiousness predicted effectiveness but not emergence, and Agreeableness revealed a trait paradox, positively predicting emergence and negatively predicting effectiveness. These findings suggest a need to understand the contested nature of political leadership and qualities required for different aspects of political roles.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2018 Elsevier Inc. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Publisher Keywords: | Trait, Personality, Faces, Politics, Leadership |
Departments: | Bayes Business School |
SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (791kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year