City Research Online

Abstract

© 2018 Wojciechowski and Pothos. Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Making? by Wojciechowski, B. W., and Pothos, E. M. (2018). Front. Psychol. 9:391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00391 In the original article, there was an error. In the Discussion section, a small error was made in one of the quantum computations, which requires minor adjustment of the discussion. None of the empirical results, analyses, and other conclusions are affected. A correction has been made to Discussion, paragraph 7. The original sentence was: For a double CF, we have: Prob(A), Prob(B) > Prob(A & B), that is a CF occurs for both conjuncts. This has been corrected to: For a double CF, we have: Prob(A), Prob(B) < Prob(A & B), that is a CF occurs for both conjuncts. A correction has been made to Discussion, paragraph 8. The original sentence was: For the participants with no legal background, we have a situation where Prob(A), Prob(B) > Prob(A & B), for when evaluating criminal cases for which the suspect was guilty for both crimes. This has been corrected to: For the participants with no legal background, we have a situation where Prob(A), Prob(B) < Prob(A & B), for when evaluating criminal cases for which the suspect was guilty for both crimes.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2018 Wojciechowski and Pothos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Departments:	School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Psychology
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Administrator

Export

Downloads