City Research Online

Implementing a quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment sepsis screening tool: an interrupted times series study

Alberto, L., Aitken, L. M. ORCID: 0000-0001-5722-9090, Walker, R. , Palizas, F. & Marshall, A. P. (2020). Implementing a quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment sepsis screening tool: an interrupted times series study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 32(6), pp. 388-395. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa059

Abstract

Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of implementing a sepsis screening (SS) tool based on the quick Sequential [Sepsis-Related] Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and the presence of confirmed/suspected infection. The implementation of the 6-hour (6-h) bundle was also evaluated.

Design
Interrupted times series with prospective data collection.

Setting
Five hospital wards in a developing nation, Argentina.

Participants
1151 patients (≥18 years) recruited within 24–48 hours of hospital admission.

Intervention
The qSOFA-based SS tool and the 6-h bundle.

Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was the timing of implementation of the first 6-h bundle element. Secondary outcomes were related to the adherence to the screening procedures.

Results
Of 1151 patients, 145 (12.6%) met the qSOFA-based SS tool criteria, among them intervention (39/64) patients received the first 6-h bundle element earlier (median 8 hours; 95% CI: 0.1–16) than baseline (48/81) patients (median 22 hours; 95% CI: 3–41); these times, however, did not differ significantly (p = 0.525). Overall, 47 (4.1%) patients had sepsis; intervention patients (18/25) received the first 6-h bundle element sooner (median 5 hours; 95% CI: 4–6) than baseline patients (15/22) did (median 12 hours; 95% CI: 0–33), however times were not significantly different (p = 0.470). While intervention patients were screened regularly, only one-third of patients that required sepsis alerts had them activated.

Conclusion
The implementation of the qSOFA-based SS tool resulted in early, but not significantly improved, provision of 6-h bundle care. Screening procedures were regularly conducted, but sepsis alerts rarely activated. Further research is needed to better understand implementation of sepsis care in developing settings.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for Quality in Health Care following peer review. The version of record Laura Alberto, Leanne M Aitken, Rachel Walker, Fernando Pálizas, Andrea P Marshall, Implementing a quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment sepsis screening tool: an interrupted times series study, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa059
Publisher Keywords: implementation, qSOFA, sepsis screening, 6-h bundle, hospital ward, developing nation
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Departments: School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Nursing
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of Alberto et al_Implementing qSOFA screening tool_IJQHC2020.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (1MB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login