Does the objective of ICSID annulment jurisprudence invite an appellate mechanism? A critical evaluation
Zulker Nayeen, M. S. ORCID: 0000-0001-5242-8728 (2021). Does the objective of ICSID annulment jurisprudence invite an appellate mechanism? A critical evaluation. International Trade Law and Regulation, 27(3), pp. 207-220.
Abstract
The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) annulment history suggests that upholding the arbitral award’s finality is the main objective of annulment jurisprudence, and the reasons for adopting such finality were the Convention-drafters’ desires for expeditious and economic resolution of the dispute. However, in recent years, the belief concerning the consumption of more time and costs within appellate system has undergone a change, and consequently, a demand for the appellate mechanism in ICSID has gained momentum.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in International Trade Law and Regulation following peer review. The definitive published version Zulker Nayeen, M. S. (2021). Does the objective of ICSID annulment jurisprudence invite an appellate mechanism? A critical evaluation. International Trade Law and Regulation, 27(3), pp. 207-220 is available online on Westlaw UK. |
Subjects: | K Law |
Departments: | The City Law School > Academic Programmes |
SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (493kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year