City Research Online

Comparison of CFD predictions of supercritical carbon dioxide axial flow turbines using a number of turbulence models

AbdElDayem, A., White, M. ORCID: 0000-0002-7744-1993 & Sayma, A. I. ORCID: 0000-0003-2315-0004 (2021). Comparison of CFD predictions of supercritical carbon dioxide axial flow turbines using a number of turbulence models. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2021: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. ASME Turbo Expo 2021: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, 7-11 Jun 2021, Online. doi: 10.1115/GT2021-58883

Abstract

A detailed loss assessment of an axial turbine stage operating with a supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) based mixture, namely titanium tetrachloride (CO2-TiCl4 85-15%), is presented. To assess aerodynamic losses, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are conducted using a geometry generated using mean-line design equations which is part of the work delivered to the SCARABEUS project [1]. The CFD simulations are 3D steady state and employ a number of turbulence models to investigate various aerodynamic loss mechanisms. Two categories of turbulence models are used: Eddy Viscosity and Reynold's Stress models (RSM). The Eddy Viscosity models are the k-?, k-? RNG, k-?, k-? SST and k-? Generalized while the RSM models are BSL, LRR, w-RSM and k-? EARSM. The comparison between different turbulence models showed minor deviations in mass-flow rate, power output and blade loading while significant deviations appear in the loss coefficients and the degree of reaction. It is noted that the k-? model gives the highest loss coefficients and the lowest isentropic efficiencies while most of the RSM models indicate higher efficiencies and lower loss coefficients. At off-design conditions a sensitivity study revealed that the k-? RNG model records the sharpest drop in the isentropic efficiency of 8.24% at low mass flowrate reaching 30% off-design. The efficiency sensitivity is found to be less for the other tested models getting 3.1% drop in efficiency for the LRR RSM model.

Publication Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Additional Information: Copyright © 2021 by ASME; reuse license CC-BY 4.0
Subjects: T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Departments: School of Science & Technology > Engineering
[thumbnail of comparison of cfd OA.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of GT2021-58883.pdf] Text - Accepted Version
This document is not freely accessible due to copyright restrictions.

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login