Accountability in AI: From principles to industry-specific accreditation
Percy, C., Dragicevic, S., Sarkar, S. & d’Avila Garcez, A. (2022). Accountability in AI: From principles to industry-specific accreditation. AI Communications, 34(3), pp. 181-196. doi: 10.3233/aic-210080
Abstract
Recent AI-related scandals have shed a spotlight on accountability in AI, with increasing public interest and concern. This paper draws on literature from public policy and governance to make two contributions. First, we propose an AI accountability ecosystem as a useful lens on the system, with different stakeholders requiring and contributing to specific accountability mechanisms. We argue that the present ecosystem is unbalanced, with a need for improved transparency via AI explainability and adequate documentation and process formalisation to support internal audit, leading up eventually to external accreditation processes. Second, we use a case study in the gambling sector to illustrate in a subset of the overall ecosystem the need for industry-specific accountability principles and processes. We define and evaluate critically the implementation of key accountability principles in the gambling industry, namely addressing algorithmic bias and model explainability, before concluding and discussing directions for future work based on our findings.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Publisher Keywords: | Accountability, explainable AI, algorithmic bias, regulation |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Departments: | School of Science & Technology School of Science & Technology > Computer Science |
SWORD Depositor: |
Download (407kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year