Promoting Law Beyond the State
Swenson, G. (2024). Promoting Law Beyond the State. International Studies Quarterly, 68(3), article number sqae102. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqae102
Abstract
In countries receiving foreign aid, non-state justice systems rooted in custom or religion generally handle most legal disputes. This dramatically influences the prospects of international efforts to promote the rule of law, yet scholars have paid little attention to foreign policy towards non-state justice. This paper explores how the nine largest rule-of-law assistance providers engaged non-state justice between 2008 and 2018, illuminating the theory behind, and the reality of, donor-state policy. It proposes a new classificatory typology of donor approaches to non-state justice detailing five strategies (denial, acknowledgement, acceptance, transformation, rejection) and four goals (judicial reform, symbolic recognition, state-building, counterinsurgency). It then explores how the nine largest rule-of-law-assistance donor states addressed non-state justice through a structured comparison of policy documents as well as case studies of the five donors with the most comprehensive approaches. Donors strongly favored risk-averse approaches, even when this made success unlikely. Certain policy goals – such as state-building or counterinsurgency – sometimes prompted riskier choices, but only with a compelling justification and a reasonable prospect of success. Overall, major rule-oflaw donors displayed risk-averse, superficial policy, minimal stakeholder engagement, a failure to grapple with the nuances of legal pluralism, and a lack of evidence to support existing policies.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © The Author(s) (2024). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/isq/article/68/3/sqae102/7708174 by guest on 08 July 2024 |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General) K Law |
Departments: | School of Policy & Global Affairs School of Policy & Global Affairs > International Politics |
SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.
Download (747kB) | Preview
This document is not freely accessible due to copyright restrictions.
To request a copy, please use the button below.
Request a copyExport
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year