City Research Online

The Moral and Strategic Clarity of Supporting Ukraine’s Self-Defense: Why Accepting Russian Colonialism Should Remain a Taboo

Oksamytna, K. ORCID: 0000-0001-7725-3151 (2024). The Moral and Strategic Clarity of Supporting Ukraine’s Self-Defense: Why Accepting Russian Colonialism Should Remain a Taboo. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 42(7), pp. 1133-1138. doi: 10.1177/23996544241277319

Abstract

In response to Toal’s article “The Territorial Taboo: Explaining the Public Aversion to Negotiations in the Ukraine War Support Coalition”, I argue that the alleged silencing of those who push for Ukraine’s territorial concessions to Russia is an exaggerated problem. The reason why such voices are not gaining traction is because, as of summer 2024, neither Ukraine nor key European states had a majority in favor of territorial concessions. This is reassuring: it means that there is little appetite for endorsing Russian colonialism and abandoning Ukrainians on the occupied territories to Russian terror in the hope of an illusory “peace”. In contrast to the majority opinion, Toal calls for sacrificing (a part of) Ukraine in order to freeze the conflict and reduce great power tensions. To make such a colonial proposition seem palatable, Toal tries to shift the blame for the continuation of the war from Russia, the aggressor, to Ukraine, the victim. In reality, Ukrainians want peace, just not on Russia’s terms. Any settlement that does not involve the restoration of Ukraine’s territorial integrity is unjust and likely unsustainable. It would give Russia an opportunity to re-arm, extracting resources from the newly occupied Ukrainian territories. Russian officials showed no intention of abiding by any potential agreements with Ukraine, reiterating their goal of destroying the Ukrainian nation and state. Since aggression against Ukraine did not attract widespread opposition within Russia and garnered quite a few enthusiastic supporters, a change in Russian policy seemed improbable as of summer 2024. The continuation of armed resistance against the Russian invasion is Ukraine’s only choice.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Request permissions for this article.
Publisher Keywords: Ukraine, Colonialism, Russia, war, peace
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
J Political Science > JZ International relations
U Military Science > U Military Science (General)
Departments: School of Policy & Global Affairs
School of Policy & Global Affairs > International Politics
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of oksamytna-2024-the-moral-and-strategic-clarity-of-supporting-ukraine-s-self-defense-why-accepting-russian-colonialism.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (530kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of The Moral and Strategic Clarity of Supporting Ukraine AAV.pdf] Text - Accepted Version
This document is not freely accessible due to copyright restrictions.

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login