Dwelling on the bad: Negative arguments and stimuli are given more weight in both cumulative and non-cumulative tasks
Burns, D., Pothos, E. ORCID: 0000-0003-1919-387X & White, L. (2025).
Dwelling on the bad: Negative arguments and stimuli are given more weight in both cumulative and non-cumulative tasks.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
Abstract
Studies of order-effects have often been siloed into those focused on question-order effects, which examine pairs of purportedly independent items, and information-order effects, which ask participants to combine multiple pieces of information. We present data from both types of tasks demonstrating a previously unreported asymmetry, where negative stimuli have a stronger effect on subsequent positive stimuli than vice versa. Data are reanalyzed from three previously published studies of order effects, as well as two novel experiments; we observed consistent results across a variety of tasks and stimuli. These results are discussed in the context of both traditional models like Hogarth and Einhorn's belief-adjustment model and more recent attempts to use quantum probability theory to model order effects.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This article will be published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology by SAGE and it will be available online at journals.sagepub.com/home/qjp. Reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Departments: | School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Psychology |
SWORD Depositor: |
Download (823kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year