City Research Online

Dwelling on the bad: Negative arguments and stimuli are given more weight in both cumulative and non-cumulative tasks

Burns, D., Pothos, E. ORCID: 0000-0003-1919-387X & White, L. (2025). Dwelling on the bad: Negative arguments and stimuli are given more weight in both cumulative and non-cumulative tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,

Abstract

Studies of order-effects have often been siloed into those focused on question-order effects, which examine pairs of purportedly independent items, and information-order effects, which ask participants to combine multiple pieces of information. We present data from both types of tasks demonstrating a previously unreported asymmetry, where negative stimuli have a stronger effect on subsequent positive stimuli than vice versa. Data are reanalyzed from three previously published studies of order effects, as well as two novel experiments; we observed consistent results across a variety of tasks and stimuli. These results are discussed in the context of both traditional models like Hogarth and Einhorn's belief-adjustment model and more recent attempts to use quantum probability theory to model order effects.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: This article will be published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology by SAGE and it will be available online at journals.sagepub.com/home/qjp. Reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses.
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Departments: School of Health & Medical Sciences
School of Health & Medical Sciences > Psychology
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of Negative Info Sticks v2.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (823kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login