Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources
Philibert, M. ORCID: 0000-0003-2847-7655, Gissler, M., Zurriaga, O.
ORCID: 0000-0001-7279-432X , Donati, S.
ORCID: 0000-0002-4607-2072, Drausnik, Z., Heller, G., Macfarlane, A.
ORCID: 0000-0003-0977-7214, Mohangoo, A., Sakkeus, L., Tica, V., Velebil, P., Klimont, J., Broeders, L., Rihs, T. A. & Zeitlin, J.
ORCID: 0000-0002-9568-2969 (2025).
Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources.
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology,
doi: 10.1111/ppe.13178
Abstract
Background
International comparisons of population birth data provide essential benchmarks for evaluating perinatal health policies.
Objectives
This study aimed to describe routine national data sources in Europe by their ability to provide core perinatal health indicators.
Methods
The Euro-Peristat Network collected routine national data on a recommended set of core indicators from 2015 to 2021 using a federated protocol based on a common data model with 16 data items. Data providers completed an online questionnaire to describe the sources used in each country. We classified countries by the number of data items they provided (all 16, 15–14, < 14).
Results
A total of 29 out of the 31 countries that provided data responded to the survey. Routine data sources included birth certificates (15 countries), electronic medical records (EMR) from delivery hospitalisations (16 countries), direct entry by health providers (9 countries), EMR from other care providers (7 countries) and Hospital Discharge Summaries (7 countries). Completeness of population coverage was at least 98%, with 17 countries reporting 100%. These databases most often included mothers giving birth in the national territory, regardless of nationality or place of residence (24 countries), whereas others register births to residents only. In 20 countries, routine sources were linked, including linkage between birth and death certificates (16 countries). Countries providing all 16 items (N = 8) were more likely to use EMRs from delivery hospitalisations (100%) compared to 50% and 11% in countries with 15–14 items (N = 12) and < 14 items (N = 9), respectively. Linkage was also more common in these countries (100%) versus 75% and 56%, respectively. Other data source characteristics did not differ by the ability to provide data on core perinatal indicators.
Conclusions
There are wide differences between countries in the data sources used to construct perinatal health indicators in Europe. Countries using EMR linking to other sources had the best data availability.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2025 The Author(s). Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
Publisher Keywords: | birth data, Europe, international comparisons, perinatal indicators, pregnancy |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics |
Departments: | School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Midwifery & Radiography |
SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.
Download (421kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year