City Research Online

Abstract

Background
Research indicates various barriers to cervical cancer screening for transgender people, contributing to cancer inequities. Further research is required to better understand how these barriers affect experiences along the screening trajectory, from engaging with information, through invitation and testing, to receiving test results. Research exploring how transgender people navigate these barriers is also required.

Aim
To explore the experiences of cervical cancer screening in Sweden among transgender people who were assigned female at birth, and to identify touchpoints in need of improvement along the cervical cancer screening trajectory.

Design
Qualitative interview study inspired by journey mapping.

Methods
Semi‐structured interviews (n = 18) and interpretive description analysis.

Results
Five phases were identified comprising participants' cervical cancer screening journey, with touchpoints in each phase indicating key experiences, barriers, and strategies to navigate barriers. Experiences of touchpoints were affected by four interrelated dimensions: The embodied person—personal gender identity, relationship with own body, and transition process; System factors—policies, routines, and practices; Gender norms and transphobia; and Prior healthcare experiences. Significant barriers included a lack of trans‐specific screening information; an invitation system that does not automatically invite male‐registered individuals with a cervix; lack of trans competency among clinics and staff; female‐centred clinics; gender dysphoria; anticipation or fear of being mistreated; distrust of healthcare authorities; and participant‐staff power dynamics.

Conclusion
To make cervical cancer screening more equitable for transgender people, barriers need to be addressed by considering the four dimensions that affect these barriers.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care
Findings show that staff involved in policy and clinical practice can improve transgender people's experiences of cervical cancer screening by promoting agency and self‐determination in each screening phase. This involves providing inclusive information, continuing invitations for male‐registered individuals with a cervix, enhancing trans‐competency, and addressing power dynamics in staff‐participant interactions.

Reporting Method
The Standards of Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).

Patient or Public Contribution
Representatives from the Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm–Gotland were involved in the conceptualisation of this study. Representatives from trans and LGBTQI+ organisations, Regional Cancer Centres, and the National Board of Health and Welfare have provided feedback during the analysis and writing phases.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Departments:	School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Nursing & Midwifery
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Administrator

Export

Downloads