Determinants of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in an international multicenter study within the EuCARE project
Drobniewski, F., Ashmi, M., Kusuma, D. , Ahmad, R.
ORCID: 0000-0002-4294-7142, Naumovas, D., Juozapaitė, D., Toscano, C., Perea, E., Abecasis, A. B., Viveiros, M., Pereira, J. P. V., Jensen, B-E. O., Bardeck, N., de Morais Caporali, J. F., Pinto, J. A., Incardona, F., Parczewski, M. & Serwin, K. (2025).
Determinants of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in an international multicenter study within the EuCARE project.
Scientific Reports, 15,
article number 31703.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17507-y
Abstract
A total of 2079 healthcare workers (HCWs) responded to an anonymous survey on vaccine hesitancy conducted between December 2022 and October 2023 at centers in Lithuania, Portugal, Poland, Germany, and Brazil. Only 55.7% were confident about the long-term safety of the COVID-19 vaccine; 10% believed the risk of having COVID-19 vaccines was greater than the risk of COVID-19 itself. 54.2% believed that COVID-19 vaccination should be compulsory for all staff working in healthcare settings (unless medically exempt), for all patient-facing HCW (59.0%), and for all medical, nursing, and midwifery students (56.7%); fewer supported compulsory influenza vaccination, i.e., 38.0%, 41.5% and 39.7% for equivalent groups. Under half had been vaccinated for influenza in recent years. Respondents were supportive of childhood vaccinations. Level of education, specific HCW occupation and geography were associated with the degree of vaccination hesitancy. The majority trusted advice from health professionals or scientists/doctors and distrusted statements from politicians. Key factors that HCWs thought would encourage vaccination included: vaccine availability at their workplace, vaccination of professional colleagues, sufficient opportunity to ask about vaccine safety and efficacy, supportive information from international bodies, and HCW plans to visit vulnerable family/friends. Generic vaccine promotion activities, whilst valuable, require nuanced modification for different HCW subgroups, vaccines, education levels, and geography.
| Publication Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
| Publisher Keywords: | Human behaviour, Public health |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
| Departments: | School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Population Health & Policy |
| SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.
Download (2MB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Metadata
Metadata