City Research Online

Abstract

Background
Plain radiography is a key diagnostic tool for trauma patients in emergency departments, often requiring immediate interpretation so that urgent care is not delayed. Due to difficulty in accessing timely radiologist reports and the demand for rapid decision-making, emergency department doctors, including junior doctors, have, over the years, been involved in the initial interpretation of plain trauma X-rays. However, concerns remain about the accuracy of these junior doctors, which may impact patient safety. Despite its significance, there’s a notable gap in knowledge on the factors that influence their accuracy and strategies to improve their accuracy. This review explored these specific factors and strategies.

Method
A scoping review was conducted following the framework by Arksey and O’Malley as updated by Levac, Colquhoun, and O’Brien. Searches were performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and through reference list search of eligible studies from a timeframe of 1985 to August 2025. A narrative approach was employed to describe findings after content analysis of eligible studies.

Results
Nine articles were ultimately included. The factors identified were emergency department clinical experience, anatomical site-specific interpretation, radiographic image-related factors, time and mechanism of traumatic injury. Further, plain trauma X-ray interpretation training, emergency department clinical experience with a teaching programme and collaboration with radiographers were identified as potential accuracy improvement strategies.

Conclusion
Junior doctors’ plain trauma X-ray interpretation accuracy was influenced by several factors. Strategies like training, increased exposure to trauma X-rays in the emergency department with structured teaching programmes, and enhanced collaboration with radiographers can help mitigate the risk of misinterpretations among junior doctors. Future studies should not only validate these findings and investigate additional influencing factors and strategies, but also examine potential barriers to implementing such strategies.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Publisher Keywords:	Emergency department, Junior doctor, Scoping review, Trauma, X-ray interpretation
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Departments:	School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Allied Health
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Administrator

Export

Downloads