Capital and liquidity ratios and financial distress. Evidence from the European banking industry

Chiaramonte, L. & Casu, B. (2016). Capital and liquidity ratios and financial distress. Evidence from the European banking industry. British Accounting Review, doi: 10.1016/

[img] Text - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 9 April 2018.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
Text (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence) - Other
Download (201kB) | Preview


Using a large bank-level dataset, we test the relevance of both structural liquidity and capital ratios, as defined in Basel III, on banks' probability of failure. To include all relevant episodes of bank failure and distress (F&D) occurring in the EU-28 member states over the past decade, we develop a broad indicator that includes information not only on bankruptcies, liquidations, under receivership and dissolved banks, but also accounts for state interventions, mergers in distress and EBA stress test results. Estimates from several versions of the logistic probability model indicate that the likelihood of failure and distress decreases with increased liquidity holdings, while capital ratios are significant only for large banks. Our results provide support for Basel III's initiatives on structural liquidity and for the increased regulatory focus on large and systemically important banks.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Uncontrolled Keywords: Bank capital; Structural liquidity; Basel III; Bank failure and distress; Financial crises
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
Divisions: Cass Business School > Faculty of Finance

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics