City Research Online

A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods

Bischofberger, S., Hiabu, M., Mammen, E. and Nielsen, J. P. ORCID: 0000-0002-2798-0817 (2019). A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 137, pp. 133-154. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.02.009

Abstract

In-sample forecasting is a recent continuous modification of well-known forecasting methods based on aggregated data. These aggregated methods are known as age-cohort methods in demography, economics, epidemiology and sociology and as chain ladder in non-life insurance. Data is organized in a two-way table with age and cohort as indices, but without measures of exposure. It has recently been established that such structured forecasting methods based on aggregated data can be interpreted as structured histogram estimators. Continuous in-sample forecasting transfers these classical forecasting models into a modern statistical world including smoothing methodology that is more efficient than smoothing via histograms. All in-sample forecasting estimators are collected and their performance is compared via a finite sample simulation study. All methods are extended via multiplicative bias correction. Asymptotic theory is being developed for the histogram-type method of sieves and for the multiplicatively corrected estimators. The multiplicative bias corrected estimators improve all other known in-sample forecasters in the simulation study. The density projection approach seems to have the best performance with forecasting based on survival densities being the runner-up.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: © Elsevier 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Keywords: Age-cohort model, Chain ladder method, In-sample forecasting, Multiplicative bias correction, Nonparametric estimation
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
H Social Sciences > HG Finance
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Departments: Cass Business School > Actuarial Science & Insurance
URI: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/21905
[img] Text - Accepted Version
This document is not freely accessible until 1 March 2020 due to copyright restrictions.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

To request a copy, please use the button below.

Request a copy

Export

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login