Texture Segmentation: An Objective Comparison between Five Traditional Algorithms and a Deep-Learning U-Net Architecture
Karabağ, C. ORCID: 0000-0003-4424-0471, Verhoeven, J. ORCID: 0000-0002-0738-8517, Miller, N. & Reyes-Aldasoro, C. C. ORCID: 0000-0002-9466-2018 (2019). Texture Segmentation: An Objective Comparison between Five Traditional Algorithms and a Deep-Learning U-Net Architecture. Applied Sciences, 9(18), article number 3900. doi: 10.3390/app9183900
Abstract
<jats:p>This paper compares a series of traditional and deep learning methodologies for the segmentation of textures. Six well-known texture composites first published by Randen and Husøy were used to compare traditional segmentation techniques (co-occurrence, filtering, local binary patterns, watershed, multiresolution sub-band filtering) against a deep-learning approach based on the U-Net architecture. For the latter, the effects of depth of the network, number of epochs and different optimisation algorithms were investigated. Overall, the best results were provided by the deep-learning approach. However, the best results were distributed within the parameters, and many configurations provided results well below the traditional techniques.</jats:p>
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open accessarticle distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Publisher Keywords: | texture; segmentation; deep learning |
Subjects: | T Technology > TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering |
Departments: | School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Language & Communication Science School of Science & Technology > Computer Science > giCentre School of Science & Technology > Engineering |
SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (11MB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year