Heterogeneity of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research
Terheyden, J. H., Gittel, L., Jungblut, J. , Taylor, D. J., Holz, F. G., Crabb, D. P. ORCID: 0000-0001-8611-1155 & Finger, R. P. (2024). Heterogeneity of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 22, article number 65. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02282-7
Abstract
Background
The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical research increases and use of heterogeneous instruments reflects how well diverse traits are captured by a medical specialty. In order to reflect the heterogeneity of current PROM use in ophthalmology, we reviewed the available literature.
Methods
The medical literature database Web of Science was searched for the most cited articles in clinical ophthalmology. Titles, abstracts and full text articles were reviewed for the use of PROMs and a list of the 100 most cited articles using PROMs was obtained and stratified by year of publication.
Results
A total of 1,996 articles were screened. Seventy-seven out of the 100 articles identified included one PROM, and the average number of instruments was 1.5 ± 1.1. The most widely used PROMs were the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (33%), the Ocular Surface Disease Index (14%) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (13%). A simulation analysis suggested that the distribution of PROM use in ophthalmology study did not significantly differ from a power law distribution. Twenty-two percent and fifteen percent of articles did not reference and did not specify the PROM used, respectively. This rate decreased in the more recently published articles (p = 0.041).
Conclusions
Our data suggest that the heterogeneity of PROMs applied in ophthalmology studies is low. The selection of PROMs for clinical studies should be done carefully, depending on the research goal.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
Publisher Keywords: | Patient-reported outcome measures, Ophthalmology, Clinical trials |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology |
Departments: | School of Health & Psychological Sciences School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Optometry & Visual Sciences |
SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.
Download (754kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year