City Research Online

Abstract

What do journalists think of the international media freedom campaigns that aim to support them? How might their perspectives help us better understand the potential impacts of such initiatives? This article addresses these under-researched questions through interviews with 37 journalists in Sudan and the Philippines about their experiences with the Media Freedom Coalition (MFC), a group of 51 states collaborating to promote media freedom. We found that these journalists were largely unaware of the MFC and highly skeptical that it would make a difference. Surprisingly, however, most were supportive of its work. This was because they valued the “strategic narratives” it provided and the signals these sent to their political leaders, as well as the “morale boost” they gave journalists. These findings highlight the importance of strategic narratives as a key component of international advocacy and demonstrate that audiences do not necessarily have to agree with them to support them. The findings also highlight the challenges of evaluating international media freedom initiatives.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Copyright © 2025 (Martin Scott, Mel Bunce, Maria Carmen Fernandez, Rachel Khan, Mary Myers, and Lina Yassin). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at http://ijoc.org.
Publisher Keywords:	media freedom, strategic narratives, Sudan, the Philippines, international advocacy
Subjects:	J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JZ International relations P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General)
Departments:	School of Communication & Creativity School of Communication & Creativity > Journalism
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Administrator

Export

Downloads