City Research Online

The UK Law Commission's Reforms Proposed to the English Arbitration Act 1996: Bonum, Malum Et Turpe

Gultutan, D. (2024). The UK Law Commission's Reforms Proposed to the English Arbitration Act 1996: Bonum, Malum Et Turpe. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 44(1), pp. 197-219. doi: 10.26650/ppil.2023.44.1.1488428

Abstract

The 1996 Act has completed its quarter-century cycle of existence. At the time of its enactment, it was praised by scholars and practitioners as a “masterful… comprehensive” piece of legislation and one that was destined to “enhance the attractiveness of England as an arbitral forum”. These predictions proved exceedingly accurate. However, over time the legislation’s various shortcomings began to surface. Its review by the Law Commission was, therefore, very timely. This paper considers the present state of English arbitration law considering the provisions of the 1996 Act and substantive and/or noteworthy recommendations proposed to the legislation, alongside the relevant case-law, and considers the appropriateness and potential utility of these recommendations. In particular, this article considers the following issues: the governing law of an arbitration agreement, the arbitrators’ duty of disclosure, their immunity from liability, the summary disposal of claims and defences, the confidentiality of arbitration and court powers in support of arbitral proceedings and emergency arbitrations. The paper concludes that although the reform proposals are mostly commendable and sufficient to satisfy users’ concerns and expectations, not all are agreeable. Reform proposals do not go far enough. Most notably, the rule concerning the arbitrators’ duty of disclosure should recognise that, in appropriate instances, the subjective expectations of the parties should be addressed in the assessment. The parties’ reasonable and/or legitimate expectations should not be ignored when deciding what facts and circumstances to disclose to ensure that the parties retain confidence in the process and remain the ultimate arbiters of their dispute.

Publication Type: Article
Publisher Keywords: Arbitration, Reform, Confidentiality, Disclosure, Governing Law, Seat of Arbitration, Immunity, Summary Disposal, Emergency Arbitration
Subjects: K Law > KD England and Wales
Departments: The City Law School
The City Law School > Academic Programmes
The City Law School > International Law and Affairs Group
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of BE570607DEC54D56BDA6C0340D038678.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (571kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login