Does Speculation in Futures Markets Improve Commodity Hedging Decisions?
Fernandez-Perez, A. ORCID: 0000-0002-9433-7194, Fuertes, A-M.
ORCID: 0000-0001-6468-9845 & Miffre, J.
ORCID: 0000-0002-4729-9199 (2025).
Does Speculation in Futures Markets Improve Commodity Hedging Decisions?.
Management Science,
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2024.04940
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of traditional versus selective hedging strategies in commodity futures markets. Traditional hedging aims solely to reduce spot price risk, whereas selective hedging also seeks to enhance returns by predicting movements in commodity futures prices. We construct selective hedges using a range of forecasting techniques, from simple historical averages to advanced machine learning models, and evaluate their performance based on the expected mean-variance utility of hedge portfolio returns. Out-of-sample results for 24 commodities do not favor selective hedging over traditional hedging as the former increases risk without delivering additional returns. These findings are robust across various hedge reformulations, expanding estimation windows, and rebalancing frequencies.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Publisher Keywords: | Traditional hedging; Selective hedging; Expected utility; Commodity futures markets |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HG Finance |
Departments: | Bayes Business School Bayes Business School > Faculty of Finance |
SWORD Depositor: |
Download (1MB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year