City Research Online

Calderon, S., Mac Giolla, E., Ask, K. , Adler, S. J., Agerström, J., Akpinar, B., Albayrak, N., Alparone, F. R., Amin, S., Aquino, A., Bachet, M., Baisile, B., Bausenhart, K., Beylat, M., Bialobrzeska, O., Bloomfield, E. C., Boecker, L., Bonora, M., Brady, S. T., Branch, J. G., Brandy, N. E., Bui, K. T., Bustos-Ortega, M., Caballero, A., Cai, A., Cantarero, K., Cardenas, S. A., Carrera, P., Chang, J-T., Chao, H-F., Christy, A. G., Cook, J. A., Dang, J., Danielson, S., Davis, W. E., de Boer, C., de Groot, E., Derrick, J. L., Dittmar, S., Döring, T., Douilliez, C., Egger, M., Escher, Y. A., Evans, T. R., Fabiani, S., Feldman, G., Fernandez, N., Fischer, J., Formanowicz, M., Friese, M., Fuglestad, P. T., Gaboriaud, A., Gale, J., Gamrát, R., Genschow, O., Ghasemi, O., Giacomantonio, M., Gieseler, K., Greijdanus, H., Griffin, S. M., Gül, D., Gunaydin, G., Haasova, S., Halkias, G., Hawk, C. E., Helfers, A., Hernandez, C. L., Hess, Y. D., Horgos, P. J., Hrymchak, Y., Huff, M., Ildırım, E., Jokić, B., Julliard, Y., Kačmár, P., Kaup, B., Kim, H., Kim, K., Kingstone, A., Koç, K., Koppel, L., Körner, A., Kováčová Holevová, B., Labor, P. D., Laforet, B. D., Lalot, F., Lamm, L., Laurent, S. M., Lee, S. T. H., Lee, Y-C., Lemay, Jr., E., Lin, Z., Lin, Y-K., Long, J-X., Loschelder, D. D., Makri, K., Manly, H., Maugeri, N., McCarthy, R., McHugh, C., Miazek, K., Milyavskaya, M., Morvinski, C., Muchová, M., Muftareviç, S., Muller, D., Nave, G., Newell, B. R., Nurra, C., Ouellet, M., Özdoğru, A. A., Pagnani, M., Paolini, D., Papenmeier, F., Petrowsky, H. M., Pfattheicher, S., Picado, J. C., Pickering, R. M., Purić, D., Quiamzade, A., Ramsay, J. E., Renaud, T. N., Romero-Sánchez, M., Ross, R., Sánchez-Rodríguez, A., Santiago, J., Sarstedt, M., Scally, L., Scandola, M., Schachtner, J. P. M., Schindler, S., Segerberg, A., Selcuk, E., Sevillano, V., Shalev, E., Shao, X., Shaw, S. D., Shi, K., Siem, B., Solana, P., Sollman, M., Solmazer, G., Sonmez, F., Stanley, S. K., Steinmetz, J. ORCID: 0000-0003-3299-4858, Stivers, A. W., Szymkow, A., Tagand, M., Tan, Y. Z., Terzi, H., Tian, M., Tinghög, G., Tran, U., Urschler, D. F., VanHorn, D. R., Västfjäll, D., Verschuere, B., Verschueren, A., Vlad, A. L., Voracek, M., Wang, X., Wang, D., Warmelink, L., Wee, A. K. J., Wichman, A. L., Wiechert, S., Woltin, K-A., Wong, H. K., Xu, J., Yao, Z-F., Yeung, S. K., Yogeeswaran, K., Žeželj, I., Zhang, Q., Ziegler, R. & Luke, T. J.view all authors (2025). Effects of Psychological Distance on Mental Abstraction: A Registered Report of Four Tests of Construal Level Theory. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,

Abstract

Construal level theory (CLT) proposes that psychological distance influences the level of abstraction at which something is mentally construed: things perceived as less probable (likelihood) or further away from the here (spatial distance), now (temporal distance), or self (social distance) are thought about more abstractly. This international multi-lab study tests four basic hypotheses derived from core assumptions of CLT and explores potential moderators and boundary conditions of the effects. Participants (N = 11,775) from 27 countries and regions were randomly assigned to one of four experimental protocols focused on different types of psychological distance (temporal, spatial, social, or likelihood), and each experiment manipulated psychological distance (close vs. distant). The protocols for temporal distance (N = 2,941) and spatial distance (N = 2,973) were direct replications of Liberman and Trope (1998, Study 1) and Fujita et al. (2006, Study 1), respectively. The remaining two protocols were paradigmatic replications, applying to social distance (N = 2,926) and likelihood (N = 2,936). The effects of psychological distance on construal level for the four present studies were (original effects within parentheses; positive effects are consistent with hypotheses): dtemporal = 0.08, 95% CI [0.003, 0.16] (cf. d = 0.92); dspatial = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.11] (cf. d = 0.55); dsocial = -0.27, 95% CI [-0.34, -0.19]; and dlikelihood = 0.03, 95% CI [-0.05, 0.11]. Pretests indicated that valence and abstraction were confounded in response options on the outcome measure. Controlling for this confound eliminated the hypothesis-inconsistent effect of social distance, d = 0.006, 95% CI [-0.05, 0.07]. These findings provide limited evidence for the predictions of the theory and present a critical challenge for CLT.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Copyright © 2025, the authors.
Publisher Keywords:	construal level theory, mental abstraction, psychological distance, replication, multi-lab
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Departments:	Bayes Business School Bayes Business School > Faculty of Management
SWORD Depositor:	Symplectic Administrator

Preview

Text - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (1MB) | Preview

Export

RefWorks Dublin Core MODS OpenURL ContextObject METS OpenURL ContextObject in Span Dublin Core Reference Manager MPEG-21 DIDL JSON Multiline CSV EP3 XML Refer HTML Citation EndNote RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML Atom OPENAIRE Simple Metadata BibTeX RDF+N3 RIOXX2 XML ASCII Citation

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics