City Research Online

The experiences of bedside nurses delivering an intensive care sedation study: A process evaluation within the A2B trial

Emerson, L. M. ORCID: 0000-0002-4250-5758, Blackwood, B., Kydonaki, K. , McKenzie, C. ORCID: 0000-0002-5190-9711, Walsh, T. S. ORCID: 0000-0002-3590-8540 & Aitken, L. M. ORCID: 0000-0001-5722-9090 (2025). The experiences of bedside nurses delivering an intensive care sedation study: A process evaluation within the A2B trial. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, article number 17511437251381951. doi: 10.1177/17511437251381951

Abstract

Background:
This process evaluation explored delivery of a complex sedation intervention within the Alpha-2 Agonists for Sedation to Produce Better Outcomes from Critical Illness (A2B) trial, which compared dexmedetomidine- and clonidine-based sedation with propofol (usual care). All groups targeted lighter sedation levels. The objective was to understand bedside nurses’ experiences delivering the interventions and identify factors influencing protocol adherence and implementation.

Methods:
A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with intensive care unit (ICU) staff (consultants, bedside and research nurses) from A2B trial sites. Thematic analysis explored how participants experienced and delivered trial interventions, with particular focus on bedside nurses’ abilities to manage sedation in line with the protocol.

Results:
Nurses with greater ICU experience described more confidence and adaptability in using alpha-2 agonists, while less experienced staff required support due to limited familiarity with lighter sedation. Hesitancy to up-titrate alpha-2 agonists was common, driven by concerns about bradycardia and hypotension. Reluctance to down-titrate propofol was shaped by fears of agitation and self-extubation. Deep sedation norms, especially amongst nurses trained during the COVID-19 pandemic, further hindered protocol adherence. Research nurses were instrumental in supporting implementation and bridging knowledge gaps.

Conclusion:
Despite all three trial groups targeting lighter sedation, nurse confidence, safety concerns, and ingrained cultural practices limited adherence to alpha-2 agonist-based protocols. Addressing these barriers through training, support, and cultural change will be essential for future trials and practice shifts involving lighter sedation strategies in ICU.

Trial registration number:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03653832 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03653832

Publication Type: Article
Publisher Keywords: qualitative research, critical care, process evaluation, nurses, sedation
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Departments: School of Health & Medical Sciences
School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Nursing & Midwifery
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of emerson-et-al-2025-the-experiences-of-bedside-nurses-delivering-an-intensive-care-sedation-study-a-process-evaluation.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution International Public License 4.0.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login