EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia (ELLA): co-designing and proof-of-concept testing a novel intervention
Northcott, S.
ORCID: 0000-0001-8229-5452, Devane, N.
ORCID: 0000-0001-8448-1478, Behn, N.
ORCID: 0000-0001-9356-9957 , Thomas, S., Morris, A., Sockett, L., Wickham, M. & Hilari, K.
ORCID: 0000-0003-2091-4849 (2026).
EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia (ELLA): co-designing and proof-of-concept testing a novel intervention.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,
Abstract
Purpose: People with aphasia are at risk of becoming depressed, anxious and isolated. They want therapy to focus on improving communication, confidence, and finding ways to live well; family members want to be involved in the therapy process. We aimed to co-design and test a novel intervention (EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia - ELLA) that would address these priorities through integrating two evidence-based therapy approaches: elaborated Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA), a naming therapy, and Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), a psychological therapy.
Method: A series of workshops were held with five people with aphasia (six workshops); three family members (three workshops); and four speech-language pathologists (SLPs) (three workshops). In addition, meetings were held with experts in SFBT and elaborated SFA. This information was analysed using qualitative content analysis and mapped onto a therapy manual. Advisors with aphasia (n=5) and student SLPs (n=4) trialled therapy components for further refinement prior to a proof-of-concept pre-post group study (n=8 participants with aphasia). The therapy was co-delivered by student SLPs supervised by an experienced SLP; participants received on average 14.25 sessions (s.d. 2.25) over seven weeks. The primary clinical outcome was the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB); participants also took part in in-depth interviews post therapy analysed using Framework Analysis.
Results: Themes from the co-design stage included: choosing meaningful therapy targets; integrating impairment and psychological therapy; managing endings; involving family; supporting home practice; dosage and delivery; achieving real-life change. Participants in the proof-of-concept study made significant gains on the CPIB (p=0.006, Cohen’s d=1.37). All participants highly valued the therapeutic relationship and were positive about combining psychological and language components within the same intervention.
Conclusions: ELLA has been designed as a holistic, humanistic language therapy. This study suggests ELLA may be a promising way to enable SLPs to address both emotional and language recovery.
| Publication Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology |
| Departments: | School of Health & Medical Sciences School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Allied Health |
| SWORD Depositor: |
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Metadata
Metadata