City Research Online

EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia (ELLA): co-designing and proof-of-concept testing a novel intervention

Northcott, S. ORCID: 0000-0001-8229-5452, Devane, N. ORCID: 0000-0001-8448-1478, Behn, N. ORCID: 0000-0001-9356-9957 , Thomas, S., Morris, A., Sockett, L., Wickham, M. & Hilari, K. ORCID: 0000-0003-2091-4849 (2026). EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia (ELLA): co-designing and proof-of-concept testing a novel intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,

Abstract

Purpose: People with aphasia are at risk of becoming depressed, anxious and isolated. They want therapy to focus on improving communication, confidence, and finding ways to live well; family members want to be involved in the therapy process. We aimed to co-design and test a novel intervention (EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia - ELLA) that would address these priorities through integrating two evidence-based therapy approaches: elaborated Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA), a naming therapy, and Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), a psychological therapy.

Method: A series of workshops were held with five people with aphasia (six workshops); three family members (three workshops); and four speech-language pathologists (SLPs) (three workshops). In addition, meetings were held with experts in SFBT and elaborated SFA. This information was analysed using qualitative content analysis and mapped onto a therapy manual. Advisors with aphasia (n=5) and student SLPs (n=4) trialled therapy components for further refinement prior to a proof-of-concept pre-post group study (n=8 participants with aphasia). The therapy was co-delivered by student SLPs supervised by an experienced SLP; participants received on average 14.25 sessions (s.d. 2.25) over seven weeks. The primary clinical outcome was the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB); participants also took part in in-depth interviews post therapy analysed using Framework Analysis.

Results: Themes from the co-design stage included: choosing meaningful therapy targets; integrating impairment and psychological therapy; managing endings; involving family; supporting home practice; dosage and delivery; achieving real-life change. Participants in the proof-of-concept study made significant gains on the CPIB (p=0.006, Cohen’s d=1.37). All participants highly valued the therapeutic relationship and were positive about combining psychological and language components within the same intervention.
Conclusions: ELLA has been designed as a holistic, humanistic language therapy. This study suggests ELLA may be a promising way to enable SLPs to address both emotional and language recovery.

Publication Type: Article
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
Departments: School of Health & Medical Sciences
School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Allied Health
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of ELLA main text - further revised CLEAN version v1.pdf] Text - Accepted Version
This document is not freely accessible due to copyright restrictions.

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login