City Research Online

Best Practice International Guidelines on Online Communities of Aphasia Groups

Kong, A. P-H. ORCID: 0000-0002-6211-0358, Alyahya, R. S. W. ORCID: 0000-0002-2766-2915, Dow-Richards, C. ORCID: 0009-0005-9936-4406 , Hoover, E. ORCID: 0000-0003-1315-9742, Isaksen, J. K. ORCID: 0000-0002-2502-029X, Kelly, H. ORCID: 0000-0003-3694-2086, Longman, C. ORCID: 0009-0007-7164-1170, Matos, M. A. ORCID: 0000-0002-8976-0625, McVicker, S. ORCID: 0000-0002-4939-4210, Pearl, G. ORCID: 0000-0003-1290-400X, Roper, A. ORCID: 0000-0001-6950-6294, Samuel, J. ORCID: 0009-0002-0266-1112, Silverman, M., Valente, P. ORCID: 0009-0001-0002-928X, Volkmer, A. ORCID: 0000-0002-4149-409X & Yampolsky, S. ORCID: 0009-0001-1603-3179 (2026). Best Practice International Guidelines on Online Communities of Aphasia Groups. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, doi: 10.1044/2026_ajslp-26-00043

Abstract

Purpose:
We aim to establish best practice guidelines for the design, facilitation, and sustainability of online support groups for people with aphasia (PWA). It explores the benefits, challenges, and psychological considerations of virtual aphasia interventions.

Method:
The recommendations presented were developed through a collaborative consensus process by our writing team, which was informed by a comprehensive review of current literature, insights from international experts, and practical experiences across various settings. This process involved meetings held between June 2023 and April 2025, focusing on the “Community of Practice related to online aphasia support.” These discussions examined the types, goals, and key features of online support groups—highlighting person-centered approaches, facilitation skills, and cultural responsiveness—and considered technological, logistical, and funding factors critical for successful implementation. Guided by principles of evidence-based practice and consensus building, the development produced practical recommendations that reflect diverse perspectives and best practices in both face-to-face and online aphasia support.

Results:
Online aphasia support groups enhance accessibility, foster peer support, and promote social participation, contributing positively to psychological well-being. This tutorial identifies common challenges (e.g., technological barriers, engagement difficulties, and resource constraints), offering evidence-based strategies for mitigation. It underscores the importance of tailored facilitator training and sustainable funding models adapted to diverse contexts.

Conclusions:
Online aphasia support groups are valuable tools to improve long-term communication and psychosocial outcomes for PWA. Their success depends on careful planning, skilled facilitation, and inclusive practices. Ongoing research, international collaboration, and adaptable funding strategies are vital to optimize their impact and expand access globally.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2026 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. This is the accepted manuscript of an article published by American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions for information on re-use.
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Departments: School of Health & Medical Sciences
School of Health & Medical Sciences > Department of Allied Health
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of Kong et Al 2026 Best Practice Online Aphasia Groups Author Final.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (605kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login