The triangle inequality constraint in similarity judgments

Yearsley, J. M., Barque-Duran, A., Scerrati, E., Hampton, J. A. & Pothos, E. M. (2017). The triangle inequality constraint in similarity judgments. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.03.005

[img] Text - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 28 March 2018.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (715kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Since Tversky's (1977) seminal investigation, the triangle inequality, along with symmetry and minimality, have had a central role in investigations of the fundamental constraints on human similarity judgments. The meaning of minimality and symmetry in similarity judgments has been straightforward, but this is not the case for the triangle inequality. Expressed in terms of dissimilarities, and assuming a simple, linear function between dissimilarities and distances, the triangle inequality constraint implies that human behaviour should be consistent with Dissimilarity (A,B) + Dissimilarity (B,C) ≥ Dissimilarity (A,C), where A, B, and C are any three stimuli. We show how we can translate this constraint into one for similarities, using Shepard's (1987) generalization law, and so derive the multiplicative triangle inequality for similarities, Sim(A,C)≥Sim(A,B)(dot operator)Sim(B,C) where 0≤Sim(x,y)≤1. Can humans violate the multiplicative triangle inequality? An empirical demonstration shows that they can.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Similarity; Triangle inequality; Shepard's generalization law; Quantum theory
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: School of Social Sciences > Department of Psychology
URI: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17303

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics