Searching for Objects in Everyday Scenes: Measuring Performance in People With Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Taylor, D. J., Smith, N. D. & Crabb, D. P. ORCID: 0000-0001-8754-3902 (2017). Searching for Objects in Everyday Scenes: Measuring Performance in People With Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 58(3), pp. 1887-1892. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-21122
Abstract
Purpose: Treatment success in clinical trials for AMD would ideally be aligned to measurable performance in visual tasks rather than imperceptible changes on clinical charts. We test the hypothesis that patients with dry AMD perform worse than visually healthy peers on computer-based surrogates of “real-world” visual search tasks.
Methods: A prospective case-control study was conducted in which patients with dry AMD performed a computer-based “real-world” visual search task. Participants searched for targets within images of everyday scenes while eye movements were recorded. Average search times across the images were recorded as a primary outcome measure. Comparisons were made against a 90% normative limit established in peers with healthy vision (controls). Eye movement parameters were examined as a secondary outcome measure.
Results: Thirty-one patients and 33 controls with median (interquartile range) age of 75 (70–79) and 71 (66–75) years and logMAR binocular visual acuity 0.2 (0.18–0.31) and −0.06 (−0.12 to 0), respectively, were examined. Four, 18, and 9 patients were categorized as having early, intermediate, and late AMD, respectively. Nineteen (61%) patients exceeded the 90% normative limits for average search time; this was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001). On average, patients made smaller saccades than controls (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: People with dry AMD, certainly those with advanced disease, are likely to have measurable difficulties beyond those observed in visually healthy peers on “real-world” search tasks. Further work might establish this type of task as a useful outcome measure for clinical trials.
Publication Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This article has been published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, March 2017, Vol.58, 1887-1892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-21122 |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RE Ophthalmology |
Departments: | School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Optometry & Visual Sciences |
SWORD Depositor: |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (383kB) | Preview
Export
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year