City Research Online

Volume Based Feeding Versus Rate Based Feeding in the Critically Ill: A UK Study

Bharal, M., Morgan, S. ORCID: 0000-0002-7573-4290, Husain, T. , Hilari, K. ORCID: 0000-0003-2091-4849, Proctor, C., Harrison, K. ORCID: 0000-0003-0271-5272, Bassett, P. & Culkin, A. (2019). Volume Based Feeding Versus Rate Based Feeding in the Critically Ill: A UK Study. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 20(4), pp. 299-308. doi: 10.1177/1751143719847321

Abstract

Background
Underfeeding in intensive care patients on enteral nutrition is commonplace and multifactorial. This can be exacerbated by interruptions caused by routine fasting for procedures and investigations. Our study aims to demonstrate that a volume based feeding protocol can overcome the barriers of underfeeding and safely increase energy and protein delivery in UK intensive care patients, potentially improving clinical outcomes.

Methods
In this single centre cohort study, data were collected from adult mechanically ventilated patients. We compared the standard care of rate based feeding, from an International Nutrition Survey (2014/15) to the new intervention of volume based feeding, in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit. The primary outcomes were the proportion of energy and protein daily targets delivered. Secondary outcomes compared the effects on gastrointestinal tolerance, glycaemic control, mortality, mechanical ventilation days, length of stay in intensive care unit and hospital.

Results
From a total of 82 patients (rate based feeding = 27, volume based feeding = 55), volume based feeding patients received significantly more prescribed energy (52% versus 81%; p < 0.001) and protein (40% versus 74%; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in gastrointestinal symptoms such as gastric residual volumes (p = 0.62), glycaemic control (p = 0.94) or insulin usage (p = 0.75). Although there was an improvement in energy and protein delivery, there were no differences in mechanical ventilation days (p = 0.12), mortality (p = 0.06), length of stay in intensive care unit (p = 0.93) and hospital (p = 0.72) between the groups.

Conclusion
Compared to rate based feeding, volume based feeding significantly improved energy and protein provision with no adverse effects on glycaemic control or gastrointestinal tolerance, clinical outcomes were not affected.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the accepted version of the article, Bharal, M., Morgan, S. , Husain, T., Hilari, K. , Proctor, C., Harrison, K. , Bassett, P. and Culkin, A. (2019). Volume Based Feeding Versus Rate Based Feeding in the Critically Ill: A UK Study. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, published in Journal of the Intensive Care Society.
Publisher Keywords: Underfeeding, enteral nutrition, volume based feeding, rate based feeding, intensive care, clinical outcome
Subjects: R Medicine
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Departments: School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Language & Communication Science
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of Volume Based Feeding Versus Rate Based Feeding in the Critically Ill A UK Study.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
Download (401kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login