Abstract

We add to the ongoing call for greater integration between organizational and history scholarship. Specifically, we contribute by identifying reciprocal opportunities for practice theorists and historians interested in the unfolding of socio-historic patterns over space and time. Through contrasting two studies of ‘relationship’ in the international reinsurance industry - one an ethnographic, practice-based study, the other an archival, historic analysis – we illuminate the differences between but also complementarities of the two approaches. Understanding such differences provides the foundation for a more reflexive construction of future research design. Using the insights gained by contrasting the two studies we show how a more integrative approach allows the extension of organizational constructs and theories.

Publication Type:	Article
Additional Information:	This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Business History, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2021.1906227
Publisher Keywords:	Reinsurance, practice theory, narrative history, historiographic reflexivity
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Departments:	Bayes Business School > Management

Text - Accepted Version This document is not freely accessible until 12 October 2022 due to copyright restrictions. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. To request a copy, please use the button below. Request a copy

Export

Downloads