City Research Online

Measuring successful conversations in couples with and without aphasia: A scoping review

Rotherham, A. ORCID: 0000-0002-8403-3728, Shrubsole, K. ORCID: 0000-0002-7805-2447, Croteau, C. , Hilari, K. ORCID: 0000-0003-2091-4849, Wallace, H. & Wallace, S. J. ORCID: 0000-0002-0600-9343 (2024). Measuring successful conversations in couples with and without aphasia: A scoping review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13098

Abstract

Background

Aphasia impacts communication and relationships. While counselling is increasingly recognised as a component of the speech‐language therapy role, the success of conversation partner training is typically measured in terms of communication alone. This scoping review aimed to describe how successful conversation is currently measured with couples—with and without aphasia, to inform the development of an ecologically valid measure for couples with aphasia.

Methods and Procedures

The scoping review was reported in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis Extensions for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐SCR). MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were searched for conversation treatment studies for couples with and without aphasia. Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) were extracted from included studies and screened against the three‐tier model of situated language to shortlist those that measure everyday communication. Items within shortlisted PROMs were further described using the refined International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health linking rules.

Results

Following screening and full‐text review, 46 studies were included, consisting of 24 studies conducted with couples with aphasia and 22 studies conducted with couples without aphasia. For couples with aphasia, 13 PROMs were identified that measured everyday communication. Of these, 23% were dyadic (i.e., measured from the perspectives of both members of the couple); however, they usually only appraised the communication behaviours of the person with aphasia. For couples without aphasia, eight PROMs were identified that measured everyday communication; all were dyadic and measured both attitudes and communication behaviours of both partners.

Conclusion

Conversation relies on the interaction of two people, and success in conversation is best rated by those having the conversation. The use of PROMs is recommended as part of person and relationship‐centred practice; however, there is currently no validated PROM for conversation in aphasia that considers the perspectives and behaviours of both the person with aphasia and their communication partner. The PROM items identified in this study will form the basis of future research to develop a PROM for couples' conversations in aphasia.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

Communication partner training (CPT) for couples, where one person has aphasia, can improve conversation skills and enhance relationships. Clinician‐rated measures, such as conversation analysis, have been used to measure the outcomes of CPT. However, there is a lack of person‐centred or self‐rated outcome measurement instruments. that is, patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) for couples' conversations in aphasia.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge

We have identified outcome measurement instruments used in conversation treatment studies for couples with and without aphasia. We found that most PROMs used in aphasia treatment studies were not dyadic, that is, they did not include the self‐report of both communication partners. In contrast, the PROMs used with couples without aphasia were dyadic and contained items that measured a more complex range of both partners' emotions, behaviours and attitudes.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

This study provides insights into the content and characteristics of PROMs for couples' conversation therapy and may assist clinicians in selecting outcome measurement instruments in their practice.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in anymedium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Speech and LanguageTherapists.
Publisher Keywords: aphasia, communication partner training, conversation, couples, couple behaviour therapy,outcome measurement
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Departments: School of Health & Psychological Sciences
School of Health & Psychological Sciences > Language & Communication Science
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of Intl J Lang   Comm Disor - 2024 - Rotherham - Measuring successful conversations in couples with and without aphasia  A.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login