City Research Online

Co-design to consensus: Identifying the core elements of a novel intervention for pre-school children with co-occurring phonological speech sound disorder (SSD) and developmental language disorder (DLD) using a modified e-Delphi approach

Rodgers, L. ORCID: 0000-0001-6585-7206, Botting, N. ORCID: 0000-0003-1082-9501, Stringer, H. , Abdo, N., Amer-El-Khedoud, M., Baker, E., Franks, S., Harford, D., Salimi-Tabar, P., Temple, L. & Herman, R. ORCID: 0000-0001-5732-9999 (2025). Co-design to consensus: Identifying the core elements of a novel intervention for pre-school children with co-occurring phonological speech sound disorder (SSD) and developmental language disorder (DLD) using a modified e-Delphi approach. PLOS One, 20(6), article number e0326072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326072

Abstract

Introduction
Although frequently seen in clinical services, there are few interventions which have been developed specifically to meet the needs of pre-school children with co-occurring features of a phonological speech sound disorder (P-SSD) and developmental language disorder (DLD). This study aims to achieve consensus on the core elements of a novel intervention for pre-school children with co-occurring features of P-SSD and DLD (“SWanS”- Supporting Words and Sounds), where expressive vocabulary and speech comprehensibility are joint outcomes of interest.

Methods
Forty-seven potential core intervention elements, based on a priori findings and the wider literature, were generated by a diverse steering group of professionals and people with lived experience within a systematic co-design process. This was followed by a modified, two round, e-Delphi with expert Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) to achieve consensus on the elements. Consensus was defined as over 75% of participants (minimum 30 SLTs) rating the elements as either appropriate or very appropriate on a Likert of 1–5, with an inter-quartile range of one or below. If consensus was not achieved in round 1, free text comments were used to generate amended statements for the second round.

Results
Consensus was achieved on 42/47 statements in round 1. During the revision process, one statement was discarded; six statements which did not achieve consensus were re-worded; two statements which required further clarity had examples added; four statements were merged into two statements. Consensus was reached on 8/8 statements presented in round 2, resulting in 44 final statements achieving consensus in total.

Conclusions
Core elements of a novel intervention have been identified through co-design with a diverse group of stakeholders followed by consensus with expert SLTs. Additional flexibility was required within some core elements in order to achieve consensus. Implications for future implementation are discussed.

Publication Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright: © 2025 Rodgers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics > RJ101 Child Health. Child health services
Departments: School of Health & Medical Sciences
School of Health & Medical Sciences > Language & Communication Science
SWORD Depositor:
[thumbnail of journal.pone.0326072.pdf]
Preview
Text - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (666kB) | Preview

Export

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

Actions (login required)

Admin Login Admin Login